Revealed: Rangers’ new plan to sack Danny Rohl following Celtic loss.

Rangers clarify Danny Rohl stance after Scottish Cup setback

Rangers F.C. are not currently planning to dismiss manager Danny Rohl, even though frustration is beginning to grow among supporters over how the season is unfolding at Ibrox Stadium.

The update follows Rangers’ painful exit from the Scottish Cup after a penalty shootout defeat against fierce rivals Celtic F.C. in the quarter-finals. That result has heightened fears that the Glasgow club could once again finish the campaign without claiming any major trophies.

Losing such an important fixture was a major blow, especially given the opportunity the match represented. Progressing in the cup would have moved Rangers closer to silverware while also eliminating their biggest rivals from the competition. Instead, the defeat has increased concerns among fans that another season may pass without a trophy being added to the club’s cabinet.

Despite that disappointment, Rangers are still mathematically involved in the race for the Scottish Premiership title. They remain in contention alongside Celtic and Heart of Midlothian F.C., although their position in the standings is far from comfortable.

At present, Rangers sit six points behind the league leaders, leaving them with significant ground to make up during the final stretch of the campaign. The situation means they must rely on consistent performances and favourable results elsewhere if they hope to mount a serious challenge for the championship.

Nevertheless, club officials remain satisfied with the work Rohl has carried out since his appointment earlier in the season. Speaking on the Football Insider Transfer Insider podcast, journalist Pete O’Rourke explained that those inside the club believe the German coach has made a positive impact since taking charge in October.

The context surrounding Rohl’s arrival also plays a role in the club’s current thinking. When he stepped into the position, Rangers were dealing with instability following the departure of former manager Russell Martin. His exit created disruption behind the scenes, and the team’s situation at the time was far from ideal.

Given the difficulties the club was facing then, the hierarchy believes Rohl has managed the transition well. For that reason, they see little sense in searching for another manager so soon after appointing him.

Rangers make new Danny Rohl sack decision

According to Football Insider, which reported the update on 7 March, Rangers are not considering removing Rohl from his role despite questions being raised by some supporters about the direction of the team.

Speculation had previously suggested that finishing the season without a trophy could place the manager under serious pressure. The defeat to Celtic in the Scottish Cup quarter-final has only fuelled those discussions among the fanbase and sections of the media.

However, sources indicate that the club currently has no intention of reviewing potential replacements. Instead, the leadership at Ibrox intends to continue backing Rohl as part of a longer-term strategy designed to restore success in Glasgow.

Speaking on the Transfer Insider podcast, O’Rourke acknowledged that the cup tie represented a significant opportunity that ultimately slipped away. The match offered Rangers a chance to take a step closer to lifting silverware while simultaneously removing their biggest rivals from the tournament.

He noted that the loss naturally caused frustration among supporters, particularly given the importance of the occasion. In addition, there was disappointment surrounding the previous weekend’s result in the league, when Rangers surrendered a two-goal advantage and were forced to settle for a draw after being pulled back by their opponents.

Those moments have contributed to a sense of frustration around the club, but O’Rourke believes the situation has not yet translated into serious pressure on the manager. In his view, Rohl has performed admirably since taking charge of the team.

O’Rourke explained that the German coach managed to bring Rangers back into the title race at a time when it appeared extremely unlikely. That turnaround, he said, deserves recognition considering the circumstances in which the manager took over.

Of course, managing Rangers comes with unavoidable expectations. Just as with Celtic, the individual in charge is expected to deliver trophies and maintain high standards every week throughout the season.

Those demands naturally create constant scrutiny, but insiders suggest there is currently no additional pressure being placed on Rohl beyond what typically accompanies the role. Winning a trophy early in his tenure would have been the perfect start, yet the club still values the progress made since his arrival.

As a result, Rangers intend to continue supporting the manager and see him as a key figure in their plans moving forward.

Rohl plans to strengthen his Rangers squad

While uncertainty remains about how the current season will end, Rohl is already preparing for the future and looking ahead to the summer transfer window. The manager is determined to improve the squad so the team can compete more effectively for honours next season.

Even if Rangers ultimately finish the campaign without silverware, the focus within the club is already shifting toward rebuilding and strengthening key areas of the squad.

The Ibrox hierarchy will likely face growing pressure from supporters to provide the resources needed for improvement, particularly after a run of seasons that have failed to meet expectations.

Football Insider revealed earlier in March that Rohl has already identified the position he considers most urgent to address. According to that report, the manager is prioritising the signing of a new centre-back during the summer transfer window.

Defensive depth has been highlighted as an area of concern within the current squad. While the team has a preferred partnership at the heart of the defence, the options available behind them are relatively limited.

At present, Emmanuel Fernandez and John Souttar are regarded as the first-choice central defensive pairing. Both players have been regular starters, but the lack of reliable alternatives means Rangers could encounter problems if injuries or suspensions occur.

Because of that situation, strengthening the centre-back position has become the club’s main priority heading into the next transfer window. Adding quality and depth in that area would provide greater security at the back and reduce the risk of defensive issues disrupting the team’s progress.

Although other parts of the squad could also benefit from upgrades, the centre-back role is currently viewed as the most pressing need. As preparations begin for the upcoming transfer market, Rangers are expected to explore options that will reinforce their defence and support Rohl’s plans for the future.

SFA issues statement regarding Ibrox pitch invasion

Scottish Football Association has issued a response after a pitch invasion occurred at Ibrox Stadium following Celtic F.C.’s dramatic victory over Rangers F.C. in the Scottish Cup quarter-final.

The fiercely contested encounter between the Glasgow rivals ended goalless after both normal time and extra time, leaving the outcome to be decided from the penalty spot. With tension building inside the stadium, the shootout ultimately went Celtic’s way as forward Tomas Cvancara calmly converted the decisive kick. His composed finish into the corner sparked jubilant scenes among the visiting supporters and secured Celtic’s progression to the semi-finals, which will take place at Hampden Park.

Thousands of Celtic fans had made the journey to the match, creating a strong away presence inside Ibrox. For the first time in several years, the visiting allocation filled the Broomloan Stand completely, ensuring a lively atmosphere throughout the contest. When Cvancara’s penalty crossed the line, the reaction from that section of the stadium was immediate and intense. Supporters surged forward toward the front of the stand, desperate to celebrate the dramatic triumph with their team.

In the moments that followed the winning kick, a number of supporters spilled onto the pitch. The sudden rush created chaotic scenes on the field as security personnel attempted to prevent further escalation. Broadcast images showed fans gathering on the playing surface while stewards and police officers moved swiftly to restore order and guide individuals back toward the stands.

As the situation unfolded, there were also tense moments near the touchline. Some supporters came close to players and staff who were attempting to leave the field after the shootout had concluded. Those inside the technical areas worked quickly to usher team members away from the pitch, while officials and security staff tried to separate groups and ensure everyone exited the area safely.

Before the disorder that followed the final whistle, the match itself had been an exhausting defensive effort for Celtic. Throughout much of the second half and the additional period, Rangers applied sustained pressure in search of a breakthrough. The home side repeatedly pushed bodies forward and delivered crosses into the penalty area, hoping to find the decisive goal that would send them through to the last four.

Celtic’s defensive unit was forced to remain alert for long stretches as Rangers continued to launch attacks. Several balls were sent dangerously into the box, prompting hurried clearances and last-ditch blocks from the visiting defenders. The back line stood firm under constant pressure, refusing to allow their opponents a clear opportunity to finish the tie.

Goalkeeper Viljami Sinisalo played a key role during those tense moments. The Finnish shot-stopper handled a number of threatening deliveries and showed composure when dealing with high balls sent into crowded areas. On multiple occasions he came off his line to claim crosses or punch the ball clear, helping his side maintain the deadlock.

Celtic’s defenders also contributed significantly by stepping in to intercept passes and clear loose balls that bounced dangerously inside the area. Their resilience ensured that the score remained level even as Rangers increased the intensity of their attacks during extra time.

Earlier in the match, Celtic thought they had taken the lead through Daizen Maeda. The forward rose well to meet a cross and directed a header into the net during the first half, briefly sending the visiting supporters into celebration. However, the joy was short-lived.

Following a review by the Video Assistant Referee, the goal was ruled out. Officials determined that defender Liam Scales had been in an offside position during the build-up to the move. As a result, the strike was disallowed and the match continued without a breakthrough for either side.

With neither team able to find the decisive goal over 120 minutes of football, penalties became the final test. The atmosphere inside Ibrox grew increasingly tense as players from both sides prepared to step forward and take their attempts from the spot.

During the shootout, Celtic maintained their composure under pressure. Each successful penalty increased the tension for the home crowd, and the situation became even more dramatic when Rangers failed to convert one of their efforts. That miss ultimately proved decisive in shifting the momentum of the shootout.

Cvancara then stepped up to take the final kick. Showing confidence and calmness, he placed the ball carefully before striking it firmly into the corner of the net. The successful effort sealed Celtic’s victory and confirmed their place in the next stage of the competition.

The dramatic conclusion immediately sparked wild celebrations among the visiting supporters, but the resulting pitch invasion quickly became the main talking point after the match.

Attention has now shifted to the response from the Scottish Football Association, which has launched an investigation into the incident and the events that unfolded once the final whistle sounded. Authorities will examine the circumstances surrounding the pitch invasion and assess what action may be required.

While that process continues, Celtic can turn their focus back to the competition itself. Their penalty shootout success means they advance to the semi-finals at Hampden Park, keeping alive their hopes of lifting the Scottish Cup later this season.

Green Brigade provide an update on Celtic ban, confirming progress achieved

The supporters’ group known as the Green Brigade has released a new statement addressing their continuing ban from fixtures involving Celtic FC.

The situation has been ongoing since November, when hundreds of supporters associated with the group were barred from attending both home and away matches. As part of the restrictions, a section of the Safe Standing area at Celtic Park has also remained closed.

Over the months that followed, discussions between the club and the fan group have yet to produce a final resolution. The absence of the Green Brigade has been widely noticed during matchdays, with many supporters feeling that the atmosphere inside the stadium has suffered during a crucial stage of the season as Celtic compete in the title race.

Now, roughly three weeks after the most recent meeting between representatives of the group and the club, the Green Brigade have shared another update outlining the current situation.

Green Brigade Criticise the Suspension Process

In a statement released through the North Curve Celtic account on X, the group described the scale and duration of the suspension affecting their members.

According to the Green Brigade, the upcoming match between Celtic and Motherwell FC scheduled for March 14 is expected to mark the 30th fixture impacted by the sanctions. The group noted that the suspension has already lasted for approximately 18 weeks and involves around 250 Celtic supporters.

The statement strongly criticised the disciplinary action taken against them, describing it as a form of collective punishment that they believe is fundamentally unfair.

They argued that the process leading to the ban lacked transparency and proper procedure. Among their complaints were claims that supporters affected by the suspension were not allowed to take part in the investigation into the incident that triggered the disciplinary action.

The group also stated that those involved were not provided with an opportunity to respond to the allegations made against them. In addition, they claimed that no formal mechanism was available for them to appeal the decisions taken by the club.

Another issue highlighted by the Green Brigade was the limited level of communication they say they have received throughout the dispute. They also suggested that the reasoning behind the suspension has changed several times since it was first imposed, which has added to their frustration.

Talks Continue Between the Group and the Club

Despite their criticism of the process, the Green Brigade confirmed that discussions with the club are still ongoing.

The statement revealed that representatives of the group met with Celtic officials on February 12 in an attempt to find a way forward and potentially resolve the dispute.

Since that meeting, however, the group said there has been very little new information shared with them. According to the statement, the only update provided by the club has been the scheduling of another meeting.

That meeting is expected to take place on Monday, March 9. The Green Brigade explained that the date was arranged after they sent three separate emails to the club requesting further clarification about the situation and the issues still preventing a resolution.

While the group expressed some cautious optimism that progress might have been made during the recent discussions, they also acknowledged that they remain doubtful.

Their scepticism largely stems from the claim that the club has been unwilling to provide details about the concerns that remain unresolved prior to the next meeting. The Green Brigade suggested that this lack of transparency makes it difficult for them to fully understand what still needs to be addressed.

Timeline of Events and Initial Concerns

In addition to the update on negotiations, the statement included a timeline outlining the events surrounding the suspension.

The Green Brigade emphasised that they raised concerns with the club immediately after the incident that led to the ban. According to the group, they contacted Celtic’s Supporter Liaison Officer shortly after the events in question to express their worries about what had happened.

By presenting this timeline, the group appears to be reinforcing its argument that it attempted to communicate with the club early in the process.

The ongoing dispute has drawn attention from across Scottish football, with a number of commentators and media outlets suggesting that the issue should be resolved soon.

Many observers believe the Green Brigade’s return could play a role in boosting the atmosphere at Celtic Park during the closing weeks of the season, particularly as the club pushes for the Premiership title.

Celtic Fans Collective Highlight Importance of the Group

The topic of the Green Brigade’s absence was also addressed during a recent meeting between the club and the Celtic Fans Collective.

Minutes from that meeting were later released publicly, revealing that the group discussed the situation directly with Celtic director Brian Wilson.

Representatives of the Fans Collective reportedly stressed the significance of the Green Brigade’s presence on matchdays. They argued that the group plays an important role in creating the atmosphere inside Celtic Park.

According to the minutes, members of the collective suggested that the absence of the Green Brigade has had a noticeable negative effect on the environment during games. Some even indicated that the change in atmosphere could be impacting the team’s performance on the pitch.

Club Acknowledges Dialogue and Ongoing Discussions

During the discussion, Brian Wilson reportedly acknowledged that communication between Celtic and the Green Brigade is continuing.

He explained that conversations between the two sides remain active and suggested that there has been some progress in certain areas of the dispute.

However, Wilson also indicated that other aspects of the issue are more complicated and may take longer to resolve.

Despite the challenges, he recognised that the Green Brigade’s presence in the stadium would likely have a positive influence on the matchday atmosphere and potentially benefit the team as well.

Wilson also addressed speculation about the decision-making process surrounding the ban. He stated that the club’s Head of Security, Mark Hargreaves, does not have sole authority or a veto over the final outcome of the situation.

As discussions continue and another meeting approaches, many supporters will be watching closely to see whether a breakthrough can finally be achieved and whether the long-running dispute between the club and the Green Brigade can be brought to an end.

Green Brigade releases troubling statement regarding Friday night

The Green Brigade have once again spoken publicly, and their statement released on Friday night highlights just how serious and troubling their dispute with Celtic FC has become.

With the supporters’ group still banned from attending matches and the upcoming game against Motherwell FC on March 14 expected to be the 30th fixture affected by the suspension, the ultras used their latest statement to present their own version of events. They outlined a timeline explaining how the situation developed, while also expressing frustration about what they believe has been an unfair and inconsistent process.

For several months now, the club’s official stance has been that the conflict stems from an incident during the match against Falkirk FC on October 29. Following that game, Celtic stated that a steward and police officers were assaulted. According to the club, that incident triggered a disciplinary measure which had previously been suspended and was then activated against the Green Brigade. The sanction was formally confirmed on November 7.

However, the issue did not remain limited to that original explanation. In subsequent updates, the club expanded its reasoning for the punishment. Celtic cited additional concerns including alleged intimidation of staff members, certain activity on social media, and broader issues relating to matchday safety and security at Celtic Park.

The Green Brigade have strongly disputed the club’s account and insist they will not accept it without challenge. In their most recent statement, the group argued that approximately 250 supporters have been subjected to what they describe as collective punishment. They claim those individuals were sanctioned without being given a proper opportunity to defend themselves. According to the group, there has been no clear disciplinary process, no right to formally respond to accusations, and no realistic route for appeal. They also criticised the level of communication from the club, suggesting that information has been limited and inconsistent throughout the dispute.

Another key grievance raised in the statement concerns what the group believes is a shifting justification for the ban. The Green Brigade claim that the reasoning behind the suspension has changed multiple times since the issue first emerged.

To support their position, the supporters outlined a detailed timeline of events. They state that concerns about the security arrangements on matchdays were first raised as early as August with the Celtic Fans Collective. According to the group, these concerns existed well before the incident at the Falkirk match in late October.

The statement goes on to say that after the October 29 events, the group once again raised concerns about the matchday security operation. This time the matter was reportedly brought to the attention of the club’s Supporter Liaison Officer. Despite that communication, the Green Brigade say that 250 fans were issued with a six-match suspension on November 7.

Several later developments have further intensified tensions between supporters and the club. One of the points highlighted by the group relates to a Safety Advisory Group meeting that took place on November 18. The Green Brigade claim that representatives of the fanbase were not allowed to participate in that meeting, which they argue prevented supporters from properly presenting their perspective.

Two days later, on November 20, five Celtic supporters were arrested. The Green Brigade say this incident became another element of the dispute. However, they point out that a police-imposed ban preventing those individuals from attending matches at Celtic Park was subsequently overturned in court. According to the group, that outcome undermines claims that those supporters posed an ongoing safety risk.

Overall, the situation has evolved into a dispute over competing narratives as much as anything else. On one side, the club maintains that the disciplinary measures were necessary because of serious concerns surrounding safety and behaviour. On the other side, the Green Brigade argue they have been excluded without due process and without fair consideration of their position.

From the outside, it is increasingly difficult to ignore the length of time the conflict has been allowed to continue. What began as a six-match suspension has now extended far beyond that timeframe. If the Green Brigade remain excluded for the upcoming match against Motherwell, it will mark the 30th fixture affected by the sanctions.

The ongoing dispute also arrives at a crucial stage of the football season. Celtic FC currently sit second in the Scottish Premiership table, trailing Heart of Midlothian FC by five points with nine matches remaining. With the title race still open, the atmosphere inside Celtic Park could play an important role during the final weeks of the campaign.

Regardless of where supporters stand on the argument itself, there is a growing sense that the situation has reached a point where a resolution is needed. The dispute has lasted months and has created significant tension between the club’s hierarchy and a section of its support.

Many observers believe it would be in the best interests of everyone involved—including the club’s leadership, its broader fanbase, and the Green Brigade themselves—to find a workable solution before the end of the season. With nine games remaining and the championship still within reach, having the full backing of the supporters could be vital.

If Celtic are to close the five-point gap on Hearts, the atmosphere at Celtic Park during the run-in may prove crucial. For that reason, there are increasing calls for the club to reconsider its approach and bring an end to what critics describe as collective punishment.

Ultimately, the situation has reached a stage where sensible decisions and meaningful dialogue appear necessary if the long-running dispute is to be resolved.

Full Green Brigade statement below

SFA panel delivers verdict on major Rangers and Celtic decisions, along with Hearts vs. Aberdeen grievances

The Scottish Football Association’s Key Match Incident (KMI) panel has released its latest review of refereeing decisions from the past week in the Scottish Premiership, assessing a number of controversial moments involving clubs including Rangers, Celtic, Heart of Midlothian and Aberdeen.

The three-person panel, which meets every week and is made up of experienced figures from within the Scottish game, examined ten incidents from matches played between February 28 and March 4. After reviewing each situation, the panel concluded that the match officials handled every one of them correctly.

One of the most discussed incidents came during last Sunday’s Old Firm clash between Rangers and Celtic at Ibrox. Late drama unfolded in the 89th minute when Celtic appealed for a penalty after a header from Daizen Maeda struck the arm of Rangers defender Dujon Sterling before diverting toward goalkeeper Jack Butland. At that stage of the match, Rangers were leading 2–1.

Referee John Beaton was advised by VAR official Steven McLean to review the incident on the pitchside monitor. After watching the replay, Beaton determined that the ball had struck Sterling’s arm and awarded Celtic a penalty.

Celtic midfielder Reo Hatate stepped up to take the spot kick, but Butland initially denied him with a save. The goalkeeper also managed to block the rebound attempt, yet Hatate eventually forced the ball across the line at the third attempt, ensuring Celtic secured a dramatic late equaliser. Following its review, the KMI panel unanimously agreed that the decision to award the penalty was correct.

Another talking point involving Celtic occurred in their 2–1 victory over Aberdeen on Wednesday. The Glasgow side believed they should have been awarded a penalty when a cross from Sebastian Tounekti appeared to strike the arm of Aberdeen defender Jack Milne inside the penalty area.

Despite strong appeals from Celtic players, referee Nick Walsh decided against awarding a spot kick. VAR official Chris Graham checked the footage but concluded that the situation did not warrant an on-field review.

Celtic manager Martin O’Neill expressed frustration after the match, stating that the incident appeared to be a clear handball and that his team should have been given a penalty. However, the KMI panel disagreed with that assessment. After examining the footage, the panel confirmed that the referee’s original call was correct and unanimously supported the on-field decision not to award a penalty.

The same match also featured a penalty awarded to Aberdeen when Celtic defender Liam Scales was judged to have fouled Toyosi Olusanya inside the box. Walsh awarded the penalty during the game, and the decision was subsequently checked and upheld by Graham on VAR. The KMI panel reviewed the challenge and agreed that the officials had made the correct call in awarding the spot kick.

Another point of contention from the match concerned Celtic’s winning goal, scored by substitute Benjamin Nygren after a cutback from James Forrest. Aberdeen interim manager Peter Leven argued afterwards that Nygren appeared to be in an offside position when the pass was delivered. However, that particular incident was not included in the KMI panel’s list of cases reviewed for the week.

Meanwhile, Aberdeen also had complaints during their 1–0 defeat against Hearts at Tynecastle the previous Saturday. In that match, midfielder Stuart Armstrong went down in the penalty area following a challenge from Hearts defender Michael Steinwender. Leven insisted after the game that the incident should have resulted in a penalty for Aberdeen, claiming it was an obvious foul.

The KMI panel, however, reached a different conclusion. After studying the challenge, all three members agreed that the referee had made the correct decision in allowing play to continue. Aberdeen also appealed for a separate penalty in the same match for an alleged handball by a Hearts player, but that claim was also rejected by the panel.

In total, the KMI panel reviewed ten key incidents from the Scottish Premiership fixtures played across the specified dates. Their final verdict was that match officials made the correct decisions in every case examined, meaning no errors were recorded for the period under review.