Celtic informed they are unable to appoint a former Premier League manager as their new boss.

The debate surrounding who should become the next manager of Celtic continues to intensify, with numerous names being suggested as potential candidates. However, when Steve Clarke was mentioned as a possible successor, former player turned pundit Si Ferry firmly rejected the idea, insisting that the current Scotland boss is not suited to the role.

During a recent discussion on the Open Goal platform, Gordon Dalziel proposed that Clarke’s next logical career move after his tenure with the national team could be taking charge at Celtic. However, Ferry immediately dismissed the suggestion, making it clear that he does not believe Clarke could or should be appointed to the position.

Clarke Focused on International Duties

At present, Clarke is fully committed to his role with the Scotland national football team, preparing the side for the upcoming 2026 FIFA World Cup. The tournament, set to be hosted jointly by United States, Mexico, and Canada, represents another significant milestone for Clarke, who has already guided Scotland to three major tournaments.

His achievements with the national team include leading Scotland to their first World Cup appearance since 1998, a feat that has earned him widespread recognition and respect within the game. Despite this success, questions remain about whether his managerial approach would translate effectively to a club of Celtic’s stature and expectations.

Style of Play Raises Concerns

For Ferry, the primary issue lies in Clarke’s tactical philosophy. While acknowledging Clarke’s accomplishments, he argued that his style of play does not align with what is required at Celtic. When pressed by fellow panelists, Ferry emphasized that the club demands a more expansive and attacking approach.

He maintained that Celtic supporters expect a brand of football that is proactive, entertaining, and dominant, rather than one built on defensive organization and caution. In his view, Clarke’s teams, while effective, tend to prioritize structure and resilience over flair and attacking freedom.

Debate Intensifies on Panel

The discussion became more animated as Derek Ferguson and Dalziel challenged Ferry’s stance, pointing out that Clarke has enjoyed success at various levels of the game. James McFadden also weighed in, highlighting Clarke’s previous work at Kilmarnock, where he achieved impressive results.

McFadden suggested that Clarke’s time at Rugby Park included elements of attacking play, attempting to counter the perception that his teams are purely defensive. However, Ferry remained unconvinced, reiterating his belief that Clarke’s overall approach is not suitable for Celtic.

Kilmarnock Tenure Revisited

Clarke’s spell at Kilmarnock is often cited as one of his most notable achievements in club management. He transformed the team into a highly competitive side, capable of challenging stronger opponents and securing positive results both domestically and in European competition.

Despite this success, Ferry argued that the style employed during that period would not be acceptable at Celtic. He acknowledged that Kilmarnock were effective under Clarke but insisted that their approach was fundamentally defensive and pragmatic, characteristics that do not align with the expectations of Celtic supporters.

Expectations at Celtic

Managing Celtic comes with unique demands that go beyond simply winning matches. The club’s identity is closely tied to an attacking philosophy, with an emphasis on entertaining football and consistent dominance over opponents.

Ferry stressed that any prospective manager must embrace this identity, delivering performances that excite fans while also achieving results. In his view, appointing a coach whose style prioritizes caution and defensive solidity would be a step in the wrong direction.

Call for Major Changes

The conversation also touched on the broader context at Celtic, with suggestions that significant बदलाव may be required within the squad. Ferry indicated that the club could be heading toward one of the most substantial rebuilds in recent years, with a focus on restoring a more aggressive and dynamic style of play.

Such a transformation would likely involve changes both on and off the pitch, including the appointment of a manager capable of implementing a high-intensity, attacking system. For Ferry, this further underscores why Clarke would not be the right fit for the role.

Contrasting Approaches

Clarke’s managerial style has proven highly effective at the international level, where organization, discipline, and defensive strength are often key to success. His ability to make Scotland difficult to break down has been a major factor in their recent achievements.

However, Ferry argued that this approach would not translate well to Celtic, where the emphasis is on controlling games, pressing high, and creating numerous scoring opportunities. Attempting to replicate a more conservative system in such an environment, he suggested, could lead to negative outcomes.

Panel Exchange Highlights Divide

The exchange between the panelists highlighted the differing opinions on Clarke’s suitability. While Dalziel and Ferguson appeared open to the idea, acknowledging that some fans might be hesitant, Ferry remained steadfast in his opposition.

When asked directly why he would not want Clarke as Celtic manager, Ferry’s response was clear: the team needs a more attacking philosophy. He emphasized that style is just as important as results at a club like Celtic, and any deviation from that expectation would be problematic.

Conclusion

The ongoing debate over Celtic’s next managerial appointment reflects the high standards and strong opinions that surround the club. While Steve Clarke’s credentials are undeniable, his tactical approach continues to divide opinion among pundits and supporters alike.

For Si Ferry, the issue is straightforward—Celtic require a manager who can deliver an exciting, attacking brand of football, and he does not believe Clarke fits that profile. As discussions continue and speculation grows, the club faces a crucial decision that will shape its future direction both on and off the pitch.

Green Brigade predicts Celtic ban will endure ‘for a long time’ in rare interview

The Green Brigade believe their current ban from Celtic matches at Celtic Park is likely to continue for an extended period, according to comments made by a member of the group in a rare and candid interview.

The supporters’ group has been prohibited from attending fixtures since November of last year. The sanction followed an incident that took place during a Premiership clash against Falkirk in the preceding month, which ultimately led to the club taking disciplinary action.

Earlier this month, interim chairman Brian Wilson suggested there was reason for optimism regarding a possible resolution, hinting that a return for the group might be achievable. However, those hopeful remarks do not appear to reflect the sentiment within the Green Brigade itself.

Speaking to The Cynic Weekly, a member identified as Martin explained that the group does not share the same positive outlook as the club’s leadership. He made it clear that, from their perspective, responsibility for progress lies firmly with the club.

He stated that the situation is effectively in Celtic’s hands, emphasizing that the Green Brigade believe the requests they have put forward are fair and reasonable. Despite this, he suggested that informal feedback coming from within the club has not been encouraging.

According to Martin, the indications they have received—albeit unofficially—suggest that Celtic are not inclined to accept the group’s proposals. This has led to growing suspicion among members that there may be deeper issues influencing the situation, beyond the stated disagreements.

He went further to express concern that the ban may remain in place regardless of any efforts made by the group to find common ground. In his view, the trajectory of recent developments points toward an outcome that is increasingly difficult to avoid.

Martin admitted that, in recent weeks, his own optimism has begun to fade. While he has consistently tried to maintain a hopeful stance and encourage others within the group to believe that a resolution could be reached, he now feels that such optimism may have been misplaced.

He described how he had often urged fellow members to remain constructive, advocating for dialogue with the club and a willingness to listen in order to reach a compromise. His approach has been to promote engagement and negotiation as the best path forward.

However, he acknowledged that others within the group have taken a more pessimistic view from the outset. These individuals, he said, have long believed that the situation was unlikely to be resolved in the Green Brigade’s favour and that any attempts to prolong discussions were merely delaying an inevitable outcome.

As time has gone on, Martin has found it increasingly difficult to dismiss those concerns. He conceded that recent conversations and developments have done little to restore confidence, instead reinforcing the belief that the ban could remain in place for a considerable length of time.

When discussing the possibility of returning to the North Curve section of Celtic Park, Martin admitted that his confidence has significantly diminished. While he had previously hoped that an agreement could be reached before the end of the current season, he now sees that outcome as increasingly unlikely.

Although he stopped short of saying he has completely given up hope, he made it clear that his expectations have shifted. At this stage, he is preparing for the likelihood that the group will not be allowed back into their usual section of the stadium anytime soon.

He described this prospect as deeply disappointing, both for the members of the Green Brigade and for the atmosphere they help create at matches. Nevertheless, he acknowledged that the situation is ultimately beyond their control.

The ongoing dispute highlights the strained relationship between the ultras group and the club, with both sides seemingly entrenched in their positions. While Celtic’s leadership has publicly indicated a willingness to find a solution, the lack of progress behind the scenes has led to growing frustration among supporters.

For the Green Brigade, the uncertainty surrounding their return continues to cast a shadow over their involvement with the club. The absence of one of Celtic’s most prominent supporter groups has been keenly felt, particularly given their reputation for passionate backing and coordinated displays.

As matters stand, there is no clear timeline for a resolution. The gap between the expectations of the club and those of the Green Brigade remains significant, and without meaningful progress in negotiations, the impasse looks set to continue.

Martin’s comments provide a rare insight into the internal mood of the group, revealing a shift from cautious optimism to a more subdued and uncertain outlook. While the desire to find a solution still exists, confidence in achieving it has clearly waned.

In the meantime, the Green Brigade can do little more than wait for further developments. Any breakthrough will depend on renewed dialogue and a willingness from both parties to move toward a compromise.

Until then, the prospect of their return to Celtic Park remains distant, with the likelihood growing that the ban will extend well beyond the current season.

Sky Sports Slip Up Twice Ahead of Celtic Clash

Sky Sports endured an awkward moment after making not one, but two noticeable mistakes while promoting Celtic FC’s return to action following the international break. The Scottish champions are set to travel to Tayside to face Dundee FC at Dens Park on Sunday, April 5, with kick-off scheduled for 4:30 pm. The match will be broadcast live, coming just a few weeks after Celtic suffered a 2-0 loss against Dundee United FC at Tannadice.

However, when Sky Sports aired promotional content for the upcoming fixture during their Sunday coverage, viewers were quick to notice that something was off.

First Graphic Error Raises Eyebrows

In the initial promotional graphic, Celtic forward Daizen Maeda was correctly featured. But alongside him appeared a Dundee player who, in reality, does not currently represent the club. The broadcaster had mistakenly used an image of Finlay Allan, a player who is not part of Dundee’s squad. Allan is currently on loan at St Andrews United and has struggled for regular playing time during his stint at Brechin City FC. The error did not go unnoticed, with fans quickly pointing it out and reacting to the oversight. It was an embarrassing slip for a major broadcaster, especially when promoting a live match. To their credit, Sky Sports responded quickly by removing the incorrect graphic and preparing an updated version.

Second Attempt Makes Matters Worse

Unfortunately, the replacement graphic introduced a fresh mistake, compounding the original error rather than correcting it cleanly. During a segment on Sky Sports News, the revised visual featured Dundee captain Simon Murray, which at first glance appeared to be a more accurate choice. However, there was a glaring issue—Murray was shown wearing a Ross County FC kit instead of Dundee colours. This was particularly surprising given that Murray had left Ross County two years prior, making the image outdated and inappropriate for the context.

A Poor Look for the Broadcaster

As a result, within the space of just a few hours, Sky Sports managed to promote the Dundee versus Celtic fixture using two incorrect visuals—first, a player who does not play for Dundee, and second, a Dundee player depicted in the wrong team’s strip. The double error left fans amused and frustrated in equal measure, highlighting a lapse in attention to detail from a broadcaster of Sky Sports’ stature.

Given that the match itself is set to be shown live on their platform, the mistakes stood out even more, making it a particularly poor moment in terms of production quality. While the errors were eventually corrected, the incident served as an unfortunate example of how even major broadcasters can get things wrong, especially when preparing content under time pressure.

Rangers victory overshadowed by refereeing controversy

Rangers secured an emphatic 4-1 win over Aberdeen, but the match was not without controversy, as a second-half incident involving Thelo Aasgaard drew sharp criticism from pundits and former officials alike.

Both Michael Stewart and Keith Hackett voiced strong disapproval of a decision made by referee Matthew MacDermid, describing it as incorrect and difficult to justify.

Disputed free-kick decision in second half

The controversial moment occurred in the 57th minute, with Rangers holding a narrow 2-1 advantage early in the second half. During the passage of play, MacDermid awarded a free kick to Aberdeen after judging that Emmanuel Gyamfi had been fouled just outside the penalty area.

The decision followed an attempt by Gyamfi to win a penalty, which was widely viewed as a clear dive. Despite minimal, if any, contact from Aasgaard, the referee ruled in favour of Aberdeen, granting them a set-piece opportunity in a potentially dangerous position.

Although the resulting free kick ultimately came to nothing and had no direct impact on the final scoreline, the call itself sparked frustration and debate among observers. Rangers would go on to extend their lead and secure a comfortable victory, but the incident remained a talking point.

Michael Stewart’s reaction to the call

Pundit Michael Stewart was particularly critical of the decision, expressing disbelief at how the referee could have interpreted the situation as a foul. From his perspective, the level of contact involved did not justify awarding a free kick.

Speaking during coverage on Premier Sports, Stewart dismissed the decision outright, stating that it should never have been given. He went further in his criticism, describing the call as “embarrassing” and reiterating that there was insufficient contact to warrant any infringement.

Stewart’s reaction highlighted a broader concern about officiating standards, as he questioned how such a judgment could be made in a professional match. His astonishment was evident, as he emphasised just how surprising he found the referee’s decision.

Keith Hackett backs criticism

Former referee Keith Hackett echoed Stewart’s views, fully agreeing with the assessment that the decision was incorrect. In his analysis, Hackett suggested that the error may have been the result of a lapse in concentration on the part of the referee.

He argued that the incident did not meet the criteria for a foul and therefore should not have resulted in a free kick. According to Hackett, maintaining focus is essential for referees at this level, and any momentary loss of concentration can lead to mistakes such as this.

Hackett’s comments reinforced the idea that the decision was not only questionable but avoidable. In his view, a more attentive approach from the official would likely have prevented the error altogether.

Wider implications for officiating standards

The incident has added fuel to ongoing concerns within Rangers about the standard of refereeing in the Scottish Premiership. Club officials have already been vocal about the need for improvements, and this latest controversy is likely to strengthen their case.

Rangers have reportedly proposed holding discussions with other clubs in the division to address these issues collectively. Their aim is to push for higher standards and greater consistency among officiating teams, reducing the frequency of contentious decisions.

The club is understood to have engaged in dialogue with Willie Collum, who oversees refereeing standards for the Scottish Football Association. The matter has also been raised at board level, underlining the seriousness with which Rangers view the situation.

Potential impact on the title race

While this particular decision did not alter the outcome of the match, it serves as a reminder of how influential refereeing calls can be. In a tightly contested title race, even a single incorrect decision has the potential to change the course of a game—and, by extension, the destination of the championship.

Rangers’ victory moved them to within three points of Heart of Midlothian in second place, keeping the pressure on their rivals. However, had Aberdeen capitalised on the free-kick opportunity, the momentum of the match could have shifted.

Calls for improvement going forward

This episode is likely to be cited by Rangers as further evidence that improvements are necessary within Scottish officiating. The club’s efforts to initiate discussions and drive change may gain additional support in light of such incidents.

Ultimately, there is a growing sense that higher standards must be achieved to ensure fairness and integrity in the competition. With so much at stake, particularly in the closing stages of the season, accurate and consistent decision-making is more important than ever.

Ensuring that referees are equipped to make the right calls in crucial moments will be key to maintaining confidence in the game. As debates continue, this incident stands as another example of why those conversations are taking place.

SFA referee chief states Celtic should have been awarded a penalty in their costly loss to Hibs

The head of refereeing at the Scottish Football Association, Willie Collum, has acknowledged that Celtic were wrongly denied a penalty during their recent defeat to Hibernian.

Collum admitted that the decision not to award a spot-kick in the match was incorrect and stated that the incident should at the very least have resulted in an on-field review by the referee. His comments come after the controversial moment during the clash at Parkhead, which ultimately saw Celtic fall to a 2-1 loss.

Match context and implications

The defeat proved significant in the context of the title race, as it allowed Heart of Midlothian to extend their advantage over Celtic. The result was a major blow for the Glasgow side, who were hoping to maintain momentum in their pursuit of the championship.

David Gray’s Hibernian side capitalised on key moments during the match, but the controversy surrounding the penalty decision has since dominated discussion. Celtic supporters, in particular, have expressed frustration, feeling their team was unfairly treated at a crucial stage of the game.

The disputed incident explained

The flashpoint came shortly after Auston Trusty had been sent off, leaving Celtic down to ten men. At that moment, the scoreline was balanced at 1-1, and the match remained finely poised.

The contentious incident involved Jack Iredale and Liam Scales inside the penalty area. Following a corner delivery, Iredale was seen pulling Scales, an action that many believed warranted a penalty at the time.

Despite protests from Celtic players, no spot-kick was awarded, and play continued. However, subsequent analysis—and now Collum’s own admission—has confirmed that the challenge should have been punished.

Key moments in the match

Earlier in the game, Felix Passlack had given Hibernian the lead, putting the visitors ahead and setting the tone for a competitive encounter. Celtic responded just before the interval, with Benjamin Nygren finding the equaliser to bring the sides level heading into half-time.

The game then took another dramatic turn when Trusty was dismissed for an off-the-ball incident involving Jamie McGrath. The sending-off left Celtic at a disadvantage for the remainder of the match and heightened the importance of key refereeing decisions.

As the match progressed, Celtic pushed for a late winner despite being a man down. However, their hopes were ultimately dashed when Kai Andrews scored what proved to be the decisive goal for Hibernian.

Collum clarifies VAR failure

Reflecting on the controversial moment, Collum explained that the Video Assistant Referee team had discussed several relevant factors, including the nature of the holding, the proximity of the players, and the area into which the ball was being delivered.

Based on these considerations, he made it clear that the correct outcome should have been a penalty. Furthermore, he stressed that the situation met the threshold for an on-field review, which would have given the referee an opportunity to reassess the decision using pitchside footage.

Collum emphasised that the level of contact and its impact were significant enough to justify awarding a spot-kick. In his view, the holding was both clear and sustained, leaving little doubt that the infringement met the criteria for a foul.

Strong criticism of decision-making process

In his analysis, Collum was particularly critical of how the VAR team handled the situation. He noted that their communication initially appeared to build a convincing argument for awarding a penalty, only for them to ultimately decide against recommending a review.

This inconsistency drew scrutiny from observers, including programme host Gordon Duncan, who pointed out that the VAR officials seemed to move away from a well-supported case for a spot-kick.

Collum agreed that this lack of decisiveness was problematic, suggesting that the process would have been a strong example of effective VAR usage had the officials followed through on their initial reasoning.

Need for clearer communication and criteria

A key takeaway from Collum’s comments was the importance of clarity in VAR decision-making. He stressed that officials must provide clear explanations when deciding whether or not to award penalties, rather than relying on vague descriptions.

According to Collum, simply stating that an incident is “not enough” to warrant a penalty is insufficient. Instead, referees and VAR teams must articulate precisely why a decision has been reached, using established criteria to justify their conclusions.

He revealed that guidance has now been issued to improve communication standards, ensuring that both VAR officials and on-field referees offer more detailed and transparent reasoning in future incidents.

Impact on Celtic’s title ambitions

The failure to award a penalty ultimately had a significant impact on the outcome of the match. With the game level at the time of the incident, a converted spot-kick could have put Celtic in a strong position to secure victory.

Instead, the missed decision allowed Hibernian to remain in the contest and eventually claim all three points. The result has left Celtic trailing in the title race, increasing the pressure on them in the remaining fixtures.

While refereeing errors are an inherent part of football, Collum’s admission underscores the importance of getting key decisions right, particularly in high-stakes matches. For Celtic, the sense of injustice may linger, but the focus will now shift to recovering ground and keeping their championship hopes alive.

Dundee United confronts Celtic’s intimidating pattern as referee and VAR details emerge for the Tannadice clash

Dundee United F.C. are preparing for a daunting challenge as they welcome Celtic F.C. to Tannadice, with a worrying trend surrounding the visitors adding extra concern ahead of the clash.

United wary of Celtic’s comeback strength

One of the most troubling aspects for Dundee United going into this encounter is Celtic’s proven ability to recover from losing positions. The Hoops have repeatedly shown resilience this season, turning games around when behind, which poses a serious threat to a United side that has struggled to hold onto leads.

That contrast in form could prove decisive. While Celtic have built a reputation for fighting back, United have found themselves on the opposite end of that spectrum, often surrendering advantages at crucial moments.

Tannadice clash comes after derby disappointment

The Tangerines head into this fixture looking to respond after a frustrating late collapse in their recent derby against Dundee F.C.. That result will still be fresh in the minds of players and supporters alike, making this upcoming contest an opportunity for redemption.

Facing Celtic, however, presents a much tougher test. The visitors arrive with strong momentum and a track record that suggests they rarely allow opponents any margin for error.

Historic milestone within reach for United

Despite the challenge, Dundee United have a significant incentive. They are aiming to secure back-to-back home victories over Celtic for the first time in more than three decades, with the last such achievement dating back to 1991.

Achieving that feat would mark a notable moment for the club and provide a major boost to their campaign. However, their recent form suggests it will not be easy, with just one win recorded in their last six matches across all competitions.

Key statistics highlight contrasting trends

A deeper look at the numbers paints a clear picture of the contrasting fortunes between the two sides.

Dundee United have dropped more points from winning positions than any other team in the Scottish Premiership this season, losing a total of 22 points after taking the lead. This statistic underlines their ongoing difficulties in managing games effectively.

In contrast, Celtic have recovered 13 points from losing positions, further emphasising their resilience and ability to turn matches in their favour.

Celtic’s strong away form underlines threat

Since Martin O’Neill began his tenure with Celtic, the team’s away form has been particularly impressive. Starting with a 1-0 victory over St Mirren F.C. in November, the Hoops have accumulated more away points than any other side in the league, collecting 20 points on their travels.

This consistency away from home adds another layer of difficulty for Dundee United, who will need to produce a disciplined and focused performance to compete.

Home record offers limited comfort for United

Although playing at Tannadice could be seen as an advantage, Dundee United’s home record does not provide overwhelming reassurance. They have earned just over half of their total points at home this season, with 18 out of 34 points coming on their own ground.

This represents the lowest home-to-total points ratio of any team in the division, suggesting that their home advantage has not been as significant as it might be for other clubs.

Celtic’s dominance in head-to-head encounters

Recent history between the two sides further highlights the scale of the challenge facing Dundee United. Celtic have lost just one of their last 25 meetings with United across all competitions.

During that period, the Hoops have recorded 19 victories and five draws, while also keeping 18 clean sheets. Such dominance illustrates how difficult it has been for United to break down Celtic and secure positive results.

Chance to build on previous home success

There is, however, a glimmer of hope for Dundee United. Their 2-1 victory over Celtic in December demonstrated that they are capable of causing an upset.

If they can repeat that result, it would mark consecutive home league wins against Celtic for the first time since April 1991, when they achieved three in a row.

Replicating that success will require a complete performance, particularly in maintaining concentration and defensive solidity throughout the match.

Match officials confirmed for Tannadice showdown

Attention will also be on the officiating team for this important fixture. Nick Walsh has been appointed as the referee, having previously overseen the reverse fixture between the sides in January.

That match was not without controversy, as Walsh opted against sending off Julián Araujo following a challenge on Will Ferry, a decision that drew criticism at the time.

Running the lines will be Daniel McFarlane and David McGeachie, while David Dickinson will take on VAR duties.

Dickinson will be assisted in the VAR hub in Baillieston by Andrew Dallas, completing the officiating lineup for the encounter.

High stakes as contrasting narratives collide

This fixture brings together two teams with very different narratives. Celtic’s ability to grind out results and recover from adversity stands in stark contrast to Dundee United’s struggles to maintain leads.

For United, the key will be maintaining focus and discipline for the full duration of the match. Any lapse could be punished by a Celtic side that has consistently demonstrated its capacity to capitalise on opposition mistakes.

Conclusion

As Dundee United prepare to host Celtic at Tannadice, the statistics and recent history suggest a formidable challenge lies ahead. While the home side have shown they can compete, their vulnerability when leading remains a major concern.

Celtic, on the other hand, arrive with confidence, strong away form, and a proven ability to turn games around. With both teams chasing important objectives, the stage is set for a compelling encounter, where fine margins and key moments are likely to determine the outcome.

Former SFA referee criticizes Celtic’s VAR decisions and questions John Beaton’s calls, calling them ‘just stupid’

Des Roache has delivered his verdict on three major VAR incidents involving Celtic F.C. during their victory over Motherwell F.C. at Celtic Park over the weekend.

The former Scottish Football Association referee was asked to assess the controversial moments from the match, including the VAR intervention that resulted in Celtic being awarded a penalty and a red card being shown to Emmanuel Longelo.

Roache was also invited to give his opinion on two further incidents involving Celtic players, including a possible red-card situation concerning Daizen Maeda and another involving Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. During the discussion, Roache did not hold back in his criticism, even describing one of Maeda’s actions as “just stupid.”

Roache criticises Beaton over penalty decision

The first major talking point involved referee John Beaton, who required assistance from the Video Assistant Referee before ultimately awarding Celtic a penalty. The incident occurred after Longelo brought down Maeda during a clear goalscoring opportunity.

The challenge was considered a classic case of denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity, commonly known in football as DOGSO. As a result, the correct disciplinary action was a penalty kick for Celtic along with a red card for the Motherwell defender.

However, Roache expressed concern that Beaton did not make the call immediately despite being close to the incident. Speaking about the situation, the former referee acknowledged that VAR ultimately helped ensure the correct outcome was reached.

According to Roache, that is precisely why the VAR system exists—to help officials make accurate decisions in crucial moments.

Nevertheless, he questioned why the on-field referee had not recognised the foul himself. Roache pointed out that Beaton appeared to have a clear view of the incident and was positioned only a short distance away.

He estimated that the referee was approximately ten to twelve yards from the moment of contact, with no obstruction blocking his line of sight. Given that positioning, Roache believed there was little justification for the referee needing help from the video review system.

He further explained that the situation was fairly straightforward from a refereeing perspective. In his view, there was no confusion about what had happened because Longelo clearly impeded Maeda during a promising attacking move.

Roache also suggested that Beaton may have been momentarily distracted by tracking the ball in the air, something he felt was unnecessary in that situation. Since the ball was simply descending toward the players, Roache believed the referee should have focused entirely on the physical challenge taking place.

For Roache, the outcome was obvious. He stated there should have been no hesitation in identifying the foul and issuing the appropriate punishment.

In his opinion, the correct decision—a penalty kick combined with a red card—was clear from the moment the challenge occurred.

Debate over Oxlade-Chamberlain challenge

The second controversial moment involved Celtic midfielder Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and his challenge on Motherwell player Elijah Just.

Roache took a more balanced approach when discussing this particular incident. While he acknowledged that the tackle looked questionable, he stopped short of claiming it was definitively worthy of a red card.

He described the challenge as “naughty,” suggesting it was careless and perhaps unnecessary. At the same time, Roache said he did not believe Oxlade-Chamberlain had any real intention of causing harm to his opponent.

From Roache’s perspective, the midfielder’s actions did not appear malicious, and he doubted that the player had deliberately tried to injure anyone.

Even so, the former referee acknowledged that the incident could easily have resulted in a harsher punishment. He admitted that if the referee had decided to show a red card for the tackle, there likely would not have been many complaints.

In other words, Roache felt the situation fell into a grey area where a dismissal would not have been unreasonable under the laws of the game.

Maeda incident also scrutinised

The third key moment discussed by Roache involved Daizen Maeda and an alleged elbow on a Motherwell player during the match.

Some observers suggested that the Japanese forward could have been sent off for the incident. However, Roache disagreed with those calls for a red card.

He explained that while the action looked questionable, it did not meet the threshold required for violent conduct or serious foul play.

Instead, Roache felt the situation was more accurately described as reckless behaviour rather than something truly dangerous.

According to him, Maeda may have extended his arm while challenging for the ball, which could easily be interpreted as careless. He suggested that the Celtic player was fortunate to avoid at least a yellow card for the action.

Roache added that the incident became more puzzling when Maeda later became involved with Motherwell’s Ibrahim Said while the opposing player was on the ground.

The Celtic forward was seen pushing Said, something Roache believed was unnecessary and out of character.

He admitted that he had rarely witnessed that kind of behaviour from Maeda in previous matches. Because of that, the former referee appeared somewhat surprised by the player’s actions.

Despite his criticism, Roache remained firm in his view that the incident did not warrant a red card.

Instead, he suggested that the most appropriate punishment would have been a yellow card for unsporting conduct. In his opinion, Maeda’s behaviour was simply foolish rather than violent.

Roache emphasised that the action lacked the level of aggression normally associated with serious foul play.

Title race heating up

The victory over Motherwell allowed Celtic to close the gap at the top of the Scottish Premiership table.

The Hoops are now just two points behind league leaders Heart of Midlothian F.C. as the competition approaches the decisive split in the standings.

With only three fixtures remaining before the league divides into the top and bottom halves, the pressure is mounting for the clubs chasing the title.

Both Celtic and Rangers F.C. remain firmly in the race, and neither side can afford to drop points during the final stages of the campaign.

In total, there are eight games left for the top contenders to determine who will ultimately secure the championship.

As the tension continues to build, every decision—whether from players, managers, or referees—could prove crucial in deciding the outcome of the title battle.

For now, however, Celtic appear determined to maintain their momentum and continue applying pressure on the teams above them.

If their recent form continues, it may be difficult for their rivals to keep pace as the season moves toward its dramatic conclusion.