‘What are you doing?’ – Boyd is stunned by what he witnesses Rangers player do during the loss to Hearts.

Former Rangers striker Kris Boyd has voiced strong criticism following the team’s 2-1 defeat to Heart of Midlothian in the Scottish Premiership on Monday. His frustration was sparked by the actions of defender Nasser Djiga at full-time, which he believes reflected poorly on the squad’s mentality.

The match, played at Tynecastle Park on May 4, ended in disappointment for Rangers, but it was what happened after the final whistle that drew the most attention. Djiga was seen smiling and chatting with his Burkina Faso international teammate Pierre Landry Kabore shortly after the game concluded.

In addition to that, the centre-back had earlier been spotted assisting Hearts player Claudi Braga with cramp during the closing stages of the match. While such gestures might typically be viewed as sportsmanship, Boyd interpreted them differently in the context of a damaging loss, suggesting they demonstrated a lack of seriousness about the result.

Boyd Questions Players’ Mentality After Costly Loss

Boyd did not hold back in his assessment, expressing concern that the current Rangers squad may lack the mindset required to succeed at a club of such stature. Speaking on Go Ballistic on May 5, the former forward questioned whether the players were truly feeling the pain of defeat in the same way supporters undoubtedly were.

He suggested that this kind of mentality comes from within and cannot simply be coached. For Boyd, seeing a player offering assistance to an opponent and then engaging in friendly conversation immediately after a defeat was difficult to accept.

In his remarks, he openly challenged Djiga’s behavior, emphasizing that losing a match is already disappointing enough without compounding it through what he perceived as a lack of focus or emotional investment. He acknowledged that players may have friendships across teams but argued that there is a time and place for such interactions, particularly when the result has significant consequences.

Boyd’s frustration was amplified by the broader context of the loss, which effectively ended Rangers’ hopes in the title race. From his perspective, moments like these should be treated with gravity, and he expected players to reflect that through their demeanor both during and after the match.

Full-Time in Edinburgh

Hearts 2 – 1 Rangers pic.twitter.com/WR45T0HqEO

— Rangers Football Club (@RangersFC) May 4, 2026

Djiga’s Mixed Spell at Ibrox Continues

Since arriving on loan from Wolverhampton Wanderers last summer, Djiga has experienced a mixed period at Ibrox. Initially, his performances were met with skepticism, and a significant portion of the fanbase viewed the signing as underwhelming.

However, in recent months, the Burkina Faso international has shown signs of improvement. He has formed a solid defensive partnership with Emmanuel Fernandez, which has even resulted in John Souttar being left out of the starting lineup at times.

Despite this progress, his display against Hearts was far from convincing. Over the course of the match, Djiga played the full 90 minutes but struggled to make a significant defensive impact. His statistics reflected a mixed outing, including no successful tackles from a single attempt, two successful ground duels out of two, and four aerial duels won from seven contests. He also lost possession on four occasions, highlighting some of the inconsistencies in his performance.

These factors, combined with Boyd’s criticism of his post-match conduct, have reignited debate about whether Rangers should pursue a permanent deal for the defender. While there had been growing support for making his move permanent following his recent improvement, this latest episode may prompt the club to reconsider.

Rangers Facing Key Decisions Ahead of Rebuild

With the season nearing its conclusion, attention is beginning to turn toward the future at Rangers. A significant rebuild appears increasingly likely as the club looks to regain its position at the top of Scottish football.

New ownership figures, including Andrew Cavenagh and 49ers Enterprises, are expected to play a central role in shaping the club’s direction moving forward. Their approach to recruitment and squad development will be crucial in determining how quickly Rangers can bounce back from recent setbacks.

Djiga’s situation is just one of many decisions that will need to be made. While he has shown potential, questions remain about his consistency and suitability for the long term. The club will need to weigh up his contributions against the demands of competing for major honors.

Calls for Cultural Shift Under Danny Rohl

Beyond individual performances, there is also growing discussion about the overall culture within the squad. Manager Danny Rohl has come under scrutiny following the defeat to Hearts, particularly regarding his team selection.

Notably, Rangers’ starting lineup for the match did not include a single Scottish player, a detail that has sparked debate among supporters and pundits alike. Critics argue that the club has moved too far away from domestic talent in recent years, potentially losing some of the identity and understanding that comes with players familiar with Scottish football.

One frequently cited example is Lawrence Shankland, who has been overlooked despite his proven ability in the league. Over the past two transfer windows, Rangers’ recruitment strategy has leaned heavily toward overseas signings, even under their new American ownership.

While this approach has brought in players with different skill sets and experiences, it has also raised questions about whether the squad fully appreciates the demands and expectations associated with playing for Rangers. For many fans, the desire is to see a better balance between international recruits and players who understand the unique pressures of Scottish football.

Fans Demand Change Ahead of Summer Window

As the club prepares for the upcoming transfer window, there is a clear expectation among supporters that changes will be made. The demand for success at Rangers is constant, and patience is often limited when results do not meet expectations.

Cavenagh and the ownership group will need to carefully consider their transfer strategy, ensuring that new signings not only bring quality but also the right mentality. The reaction to Djiga’s actions has highlighted the importance of character and commitment, qualities that fans believe should be non-negotiable.

Ultimately, the defeat to Hearts has served as a reminder of the work that still needs to be done. Whether it leads to a shift in recruitment policy, changes within the squad, or a broader cultural reset remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that Rangers are entering a pivotal period, with key decisions on the horizon that will shape the club’s future direction.

‘Unbelievable’ – Mulgrew and Ferguson condemn Beaton following controversial Rangers decision versus Hearts

Criticism was directed at referee John Beaton after a contentious moment involving Rangers defender Emmanuel Fernandez during their clash with Heart of Midlothian on Monday evening.

Fernandez found himself booked despite appearing to win the ball cleanly in a challenge against Hearts forward Claudio Braga. The decision came at a crucial stage of the match at Tynecastle Park on 4 May, with Rangers trailing 2-1, and it sparked strong reactions from pundits watching the game unfold.

Former Rangers figure Barry Ferguson and ex-Celtic defender Charlie Mulgrew were both left stunned by the call. Ferguson, who had previously served as interim boss of the Glasgow side, expressed disbelief at the referee’s judgment, while Mulgrew did not hold back in labelling the decision as “mad.”

The timing of the incident only heightened the frustration. Rangers were building momentum and pushing forward in attack when the whistle halted play. That interruption not only stopped their forward movement but also shifted the rhythm of the game at a moment when they appeared to be gaining control.

With defeat looming against the Edinburgh side, Rangers’ title ambitions took a significant hit. Sitting seven points adrift of the Scottish Premiership leaders after the loss, their chances of lifting the trophy have effectively faded, leaving little margin for recovery in the closing fixtures of the campaign.

The second half ultimately proved decisive. Derek McInnes managed to outmaneuver Danny Rohl tactically after the interval, and that shift in control made the difference over the course of the match.

Speaking during the closing stages on the Go Radio Football Show, Ferguson voiced his frustration at the officiating. He pointed out that Fernandez had clearly won the ball and questioned what Beaton had seen to justify the foul and subsequent booking. For Ferguson, it was a moment that disrupted Rangers at a critical time when they were attempting to mount a comeback.

Mulgrew echoed those sentiments, going even further in his criticism. He described the challenge as exactly the type defenders are encouraged to make, suggesting it was both strong and fair. To see it penalised, in his view, was baffling and had a tangible effect on the flow of the game. He emphasised how quickly the situation changed, with Rangers moving from attack to being forced back after the whistle.

Despite the controversy, Rangers had shown promise earlier in the match. They controlled much of the first half and appeared the more dominant side heading into the break. The team’s performance during that period suggested they were capable of taking something from the game.

The opening goal came through Dujon Sterling, giving the visitors a valuable lead and reinforcing their early control. However, the dynamics shifted significantly after halftime.

A key turning point arrived with the introduction of Blair Spittal, whose presence helped alter the balance in favour of Hearts. From that moment on, Rangers struggled to maintain possession and found themselves increasingly under pressure.

On the touchline, Rohl’s reaction reflected the difficulties his side faced. The German coach appeared visibly frustrated as his players were unable to regain control or sustain attacks. Hearts, by contrast, grew into the game and capitalised on their momentum.

As the match wore on, Rangers were unable to respond effectively. The early promise they had shown faded, replaced by a lack of cohesion and control that allowed Hearts to dictate proceedings in the second half.

With only three matches remaining in the season, Rohl now faces the challenge of regrouping his squad and preparing for what lies ahead. The immediate objective may no longer be the title, but there are still important fixtures to navigate before the campaign concludes.

Attention now turns to the upcoming Old Firm clash against Celtic at Parkhead. While Rangers’ own title hopes have dimmed, they still have the opportunity to influence the outcome of the race by taking points off their rivals.

For supporters, that fixture carries significant weight. Securing a victory against Celtic would provide some consolation in an otherwise disappointing run-in and deny their rivals an easier path to the championship.

Looking beyond this season, there are clear areas that require improvement. Rohl has made a positive impact since taking over, especially considering the position Rangers were in prior to his arrival. However, expectations will inevitably rise moving forward.

Next season will likely bring increased scrutiny, with the demand for consistency and stronger performances becoming even greater. For now, though, the focus remains on finishing the current campaign on a high note and restoring some pride in the closing games.

The defeat to Hearts, coupled with the controversial refereeing decision, serves as a reminder of how fine the margins can be. Moments like Fernandez’s booking can shift momentum and alter outcomes, leaving teams to reflect on what might have been.

Ultimately, while officiating decisions will continue to be debated, Rangers must look inward as they aim to rebuild and challenge more effectively in the future.

Today’s refereeing was unacceptable and brought shame to Scottish football

Celtic certainly have a habit of making things far more complicated than they need to, don’t they? Yet again, supporters were taken on a nerve-shredding ride as they managed to leave Easter Road with all three points in a match packed with incident, drama, and more than a few contentious decisions.

There is so much to unpack from what unfolded that it cannot be contained in a single discussion. For now, the focus is entirely on the refereeing performance, which, quite frankly, was nothing short of disgraceful and deeply embarrassing for Scottish football.

Where to even begin? The early sending-off incident seems as good a starting point as any. It was a blatant high challenge, one that clearly met the threshold for a red card. Even David Gray, the Hibernian manager, did not attempt to defend his player after the match, openly acknowledging that Jamie McGrath deserved to be dismissed.

However, on the field, referee David Dickinson saw things differently and opted to show only a yellow card. Assistant referee Douglas Ross, who had a clear view of the challenge, appeared to agree with that decision. Once the incident was referred to VAR, though, it became obvious that the officials reviewing the footage had little choice. Don Robertson and Duncan Nicolson, stationed at Clydesdale House, could hardly do anything other than recommend an on-field review for a potential red card.

When Celtic eventually found the breakthrough and scored, there was another moment of controversy. Douglas Ross was quick to raise his flag, seemingly convinced that the goal should be disallowed. His expression suggested uncertainty, as though he suspected the decision might not stand scrutiny. Ultimately, the call went to VAR, where the lines were drawn, and the conclusion was clear: the player was onside. The goal stood, and in that instance, the technology delivered the correct outcome.

But any faith in VAR’s effectiveness quickly evaporated with what followed. The most contentious moment of the match came with Hibernian’s equaliser, a decision that can only be described as astonishing. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that it bordered on outright injustice. Joe Newell was credited with the goal, but not before he had clearly handled the ball in the build-up. From the stands and on television, the contact appeared obvious.

Yet, remarkably, referee David Dickinson did not spot anything wrong. That might have been understandable in real time, but VAR exists precisely to correct such oversights. The expectation was that the goal would be ruled out once the footage was reviewed. Instead, the opposite occurred.

After several minutes of deliberation, Robertson and Nicolson concluded that there was insufficient evidence to overturn the on-field decision. This verdict defied belief. The ball appeared to strike Newell’s arm not once, but twice, and from multiple camera angles. One particular replay left little room for doubt. Even Newell himself seemed surprised that the goal had been allowed to stand, his reaction betraying a sense of disbelief at his good fortune.

The failure to intervene in that situation represents a serious flaw in the system. It raises fundamental questions about how VAR is being applied and whether it is fulfilling its intended purpose. Regardless of the final result, this is not an issue that can simply be brushed aside.

This moment had the potential to shape the entire season. VAR was introduced to eliminate precisely these kinds of clear and obvious errors. When it fails in such a glaring manner, it undermines confidence in the integrity of the competition.

As if that were not enough, there was yet another incident that went unpunished. Benjamin Nygren appeared to be pushed in the penalty area with both hands, an action that clearly affected his ability to compete for the ball. It looked like a straightforward penalty decision, yet it was seemingly ignored. From all indications, the incident was not even properly reviewed by the VAR officials. Play continued as though nothing had happened.

Taken together, these decisions paint a deeply troubling picture. The performance of the officials, both on the pitch and at Clydesdale House, fell far below the standard required at this level of the game.

There is also a broader issue at play here. Even before the match began, there was a sense of unease about the officiating team assigned to the fixture. That in itself is a worrying sign. Supporters should not feel compelled to scrutinise the list of officials in advance, wondering whether their team will receive fair treatment. Yet that is exactly where things have reached.

The current system appears to be in need of a complete overhaul. One potential solution that has been suggested is the introduction of foreign referees, bringing in officials from outside Scotland to improve standards and restore confidence.

At present, the perception among many is that the standard of officiating in Scotland is simply not good enough. Whether due to incompetence or perceived bias, the outcome is the same: decisions that negatively impact the game.

This is particularly frustrating given how competitive and exciting the Scottish Premiership has been this season. It should be a showcase for the sport, yet too often it is overshadowed by controversies involving referees.

Month after month, Willie Collum acknowledges that mistakes have been made and promises improvement. However, those assurances are beginning to ring hollow. The same issues continue to arise, and there is little evidence of meaningful progress.

At some point, accountability must be accompanied by tangible change. Simply admitting errors is no longer sufficient. The situation demands decisive action to address the root causes of these recurring problems.

The stakes are incredibly high. In a season where the title race is likely to be decided by the finest of margins, the influence of refereeing decisions cannot be ignored. A single incorrect call could determine who wins the league, who secures a place in the Champions League, and who benefits from the significant financial rewards that come with it.

There is a growing concern that such decisive moments may not be handled fairly. If one were to speculate, it would not be surprising if Celtic found themselves on the wrong end of a crucial mistake at a pivotal stage.

Should this thrilling season ultimately be decided by officiating errors rather than the performances of the teams, it would be a deeply unsatisfactory conclusion. Scottish football deserves better, and until meaningful changes are made, these controversies are likely to continue casting a shadow over the game.

Celtic informed that a “big” offer will be accepted for Motherwell star

Celtic have been made aware that they could successfully complete a deal for Motherwell striker Tawanda Maswanhise during the upcoming summer transfer window, provided they submit an offer that meets the Scottish club’s valuation.

Maswanhise has emerged as one of the standout performers in the Scottish Premiership this season, enjoying a breakthrough campaign that has seen him rise to the top of the scoring charts. His performances have not gone unnoticed, with a number of clubs now closely monitoring his situation ahead of potential transfer activity.

The Zimbabwe international has thrived under the management of Jens Berthel Askou, consistently delivering goals and showcasing his attacking ability. As a result, interest in his services has grown significantly, with Celtic among the clubs keen to secure his signature.

According to reports discussed on Football Insider’s Transfer Insider podcast, Motherwell FC are prepared to consider selling the striker if they receive a substantial offer. The club are understood to be realistic about their position, acknowledging that it may be difficult to retain one of their most valuable assets in the face of strong interest from bigger teams.

Celtic receive encouragement over potential deal

Celtic have been given a boost in their pursuit of Maswanhise, with indications that Motherwell would be willing to accept a significant bid for the forward. The striker is approaching the final year of his current contract, a factor that often increases the likelihood of a transfer as clubs look to avoid losing players for a reduced fee or on a free transfer later on.

Given this situation, it is believed that Celtic are aware that a strong financial proposal could be enough to convince Motherwell to part ways with their leading attacker. The Steelmen have a history of developing talent and then selling players when the right opportunity arises, particularly when larger clubs come calling.

Maswanhise’s form this season has made him a prime candidate for such a move. Across 31 league appearances, he has scored 17 goals and provided two assists, demonstrating both consistency and efficiency in front of goal. His shooting accuracy stands at 50 percent, while he averages 2.77 shots per 90 minutes and 5.5 touches in the opposition box per game, highlighting his ability to influence attacking play. In addition, he wins nearly two fouls per match, reflecting his physical presence and ability to draw defenders into challenges.

These statistics underline why Celtic, along with Rangers FC and several English Championship sides, are all interested in bringing him in ahead of next season.

Need for a new striker at Parkhead

Celtic’s interest in Maswanhise is also driven by their need to strengthen their attacking options. The club has lacked a consistently reliable goal-scoring striker throughout the current campaign, prompting a reassessment of their forward line ahead of the summer.

Several players are expected to depart, including Daizen Maeda, Kelechi Iheanacho, and Tomas Cvancara, all of whom have struggled to establish themselves as the primary attacking option. Their potential exits would leave a significant gap in the squad, increasing the urgency for Celtic to recruit a new leading striker.

Maswanhise’s profile fits the type of player Celtic are believed to be targeting. His goal-scoring record, combined with his physical attributes and ability to operate effectively in the box, makes him an attractive option to lead the line.

Uncertainty surrounding Benjamin Nygren adds pressure

Further complicating matters for Celtic is the uncertain future of their current top scorer, Benjamin Nygren. The Swedish attacker has enjoyed an impressive debut season at Parkhead, contributing 20 goals and eight assists in 53 appearances across all competitions.

However, his performances have attracted attention from abroad, with Valencia CF reportedly considering a move for him. Sources suggest that Nygren would be open to a switch to La Liga, raising the possibility that Celtic could lose one of their most productive players in the near future.

If Nygren were to depart, it would further increase the need for reinforcements in the attacking department. Even if he remains, the club is still expected to add more firepower to ensure they have sufficient depth and quality to compete across multiple competitions next season.

A decisive summer ahead for Celtic

As the transfer window approaches, Celtic’s pursuit of Maswanhise is shaping up to be one of the key storylines. The combination of his contract situation, his outstanding form, and Motherwell’s willingness to consider offers creates a scenario in which a deal is very much possible.

For Celtic, securing his signature would represent a significant step towards addressing their attacking issues. It would also signal their intent to strengthen the squad as they prepare for the challenges of the upcoming season.

At the same time, competition for his services means that Celtic will need to act decisively if they are to complete the transfer. With interest from domestic rivals and clubs in England, the race for Maswanhise is likely to be competitive.

Ultimately, the situation presents both an opportunity and a challenge. If Celtic can meet Motherwell’s valuation and finalize an agreement, they could add one of the league’s most in-form strikers to their ranks. If not, they risk missing out on a player who has already proven his ability at the highest level in Scottish football.

Green Brigade reveal tifo plans ahead of key clash for Celtic FC against Hibernian FC

The Green Brigade has confirmed its intentions to organise a coordinated tifo display ahead of Celtic’s crucial Scottish Premiership encounter with Hibernian, as the title race reaches a decisive stage.

With the championship battle finely poised, Celtic are the first of the leading contenders to take to the field this weekend. Their fixture at Easter Road comes before Heart of Midlothian FC and Rangers FC face each other at Tynecastle on Monday, adding further significance to Sunday’s result.

In the build-up to the match, Celtic’s most recognisable ultras group has shared details of how they plan to create an atmosphere designed to inspire the team. The Green Brigade announced via social media platform X that they have prepared a visual display aimed at rallying both players and supporters for what they describe as one of the most important fixtures of the campaign.

In their statement, the group highlighted the role played by Celtic’s travelling support over recent months, emphasizing how fans have continued to back the team through difficult periods. They credited the away support with helping to keep Celtic firmly in contention for the league title, underlining the importance of unity between players and supporters.

Looking ahead to the clash with Hibernian, the Green Brigade stressed that the challenge is far from over. They described Sunday’s encounter as another must-win game, reinforcing the idea that every remaining match carries immense weight in determining the outcome of the title race.

The supporters’ group called on fans to maintain their backing from the very first whistle to the final moments of the game. They urged everyone in attendance to stay fully engaged, support the players consistently, and match the intensity required on the pitch by creating a relentless atmosphere in the stands.

Central to their plans is the tifo display, which has been specifically prepared to motivate the team as they enter the field. Such displays are a hallmark of ultras culture, often involving coordinated visuals designed to generate excitement and demonstrate collective support.

However, the Green Brigade also noted that there have been logistical challenges in executing their plans. According to their statement, Hibernian have not permitted the group to set up flags inside the stadium in advance. As a result, the usual preparations associated with a large-scale display have had to be adjusted.

Instead of arranging the display within the ground beforehand, the group explained that flags will be handed out to supporters at the turnstiles as they enter the stadium. This approach ensures that fans can still participate in the display, even without the opportunity for pre-match setup inside the venue.

Supporters have been encouraged to take a flag upon entry and actively participate by waving it as the players make their way onto the pitch. The aim is to create a unified and visually striking show of support, despite the restrictions in place.

The message from the Green Brigade ultimately centers on collective effort. By involving as many fans as possible in the display, they hope to generate an environment that lifts the players and reinforces the sense of togetherness within the club.

As Celtic prepare for what could be a defining moment in their season, the planned tifo represents another example of how supporters seek to influence proceedings beyond the pitch. With the title race still in the balance, every detail—both on and off the field—takes on added importance.

Sunday’s match at Easter Road will not only test Celtic’s performance but also showcase the passion of their travelling support, as the Green Brigade and fellow fans aim to play their part in pushing the team closer to their ultimate goal.